
It just seems like the Blunderbuss is better for a quick blast of damage. So wouldn't that be 110 + 90 = 200 Damage? Even if the ammo damage doesn't count. The Blunderbuss says 11 Damage per pellet, and the Blunderbuss Ammo says 9 Damage per pellet.

Which makes me think that I would rather use it for bears and emergencies. So wouldn't that be 110 Damage? If so, that is a lot more than the Pistol's 31 Ranged Damage. But then I saw that was for each pellet and that there were 10 pellets. That makes me think it is 31 + 32 = 63 damage total? And then the Blunderbuss.

Because the 9mm ammo says 32 Ranged Damage. I think that the damage is more than that. It says that the Pistol does 31 Ranged Damage. At a glance, I thought that the pistol does more damage than the Blunderbuss. And I can finally use my 9mm ammo that I have been saving up. That got me excited because that to me just seems like a better gun. To switch up from using the same wooden club over and over again, and for emergencies. Plus it only took one shot to kill zombies. And I just got done killing a bear with it. Until a few moments ago, I only had a Blunderbuss. I've never been good at understanding guns and damage.

